Bookmark This Page

HomeHome SitemapSitemap Contact usContacts

2000 U.s. Presidential Election Results

There is one minute glitter of reason that previous Vice President Al Gore admits. He does not believe that Bush should be accused, unlike most of his fellow liberals.


Unluckily, Gore’s way of thinking is based on realistic issues - he assumes that an accusation attempt would be a time and resources wasting effort that would be ineffective at the end of the day - rather than an acceptance that there is no reasonable motive why President Bush can be impeached.


In other words, statement of Gore seems to mean that he thinks accusation would not be a bad idea if the realistic concerns were not in opposition to it. That thought illustrates how out of the middle-of-the-road Al Gore is.


One cannot ignore a funny remark from Gore regarding the 2000 election argument. According to him, there are no intermediate steps between a Supreme Court Decision and a violent revolution in the system. If that is true, then, US is on its way to become the nation of laws and not of people.


Certainly, Al Gore has made the correct decision in throwing in the towel following the Supreme Court’s verdict. He had been more to blame if he had never confronted the Florida election results in the first place.


It seems that, Al Gore still believes that he could have succeeded at Florida’s electoral votes, and consequently the 2000 election. It seems that in Gore’s imagination, losing an election is similar to winning. If he has that type of vision of what took place in 2000, nobody should be astonished by his assumptions on global warming.


Find out the LATEST NEWS ON PRESIDENT POLLS


Source: www.articlecity.com